Journal of the NACAA
ISSN 2158-9429
Volume 5, Issue 1 - May, 2012

Editor:

Developing Project and Life Skills Through Animal Science 4-H Projects

Boone, D. A., Associate Professor, West Virginia University
Boone, H. N., Associate Professor, West Virginia University
Woloshuk, J. M., Extension Specialist, 4-H Youth Agriculture/Extension Professor, West Virginia University

ABSTRACT

Using a descriptive research design this study sought to determine the impact involvement in 4-H beef, dog, and veterinary science projects have on life skills development.  The study found that participation in 4-H animal/veterinary science projects has a strong influence on life skills development.  The top five items in rank order were: helped accept responsibility, helped accept leadership roles, develop positive self esteem, ability to relate to other youth, and helped to relate to adults.  Respondents strongly agreed that learning occurred in all 32 categories of project and life skills as a result of participation in their 4-H animal/veterinary science projects.  The five items with the highest mean score in rank order were: learned to accept responsibility for doing a job, learned the value and importance of ethics, learned how to select an animal, how to feed an animal and how to care for an animal.  There were significant differences between the levels of agreement based on whether or not the members had been involved in community service or served as a club officer, by gender, place of residence, and involvement in the 4-H camping program.


Introduction

Youth development is the mission of the 4-H program and allows individuals to acquire project knowledge and life skills which enable them to become productive citizens. Projects are a major curriculum emphasis in 4-H.  From 1912 to today, projects have diversified from the basic corn, pigs, tomatoes, flowers, sewing and canning topics to more than 100 project areas.  Though 4-H has expanded its educational initiatives beyond agriculture and farm based educational projects, agricultural science projects and programming still remain a mainstream 4-H activity and provide a focus for county fairs and 4-H competitions. Extension personnel, parents, and youth often credit agricultural science projects and programming with teaching life and project skills.  As stakeholders, legislators, and administrators want verifiable evidence of impacts, success stories and testimonials are no longer sufficient.  There is a programmatic need for evidence that these agricultural science projects and activities develop project and life skills in the youth participants (McKee, Talbert & Barkman, 2002; Mincemoyer & Corbin, 2001; Schlink, 2000).

 

 Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of participation in 4-H projects such as beef, dog, and veterinary science on the development of life skills.  What influence does 4-H animal/veterinary science projects have on participant’s development of life skills? Does the impact differ by gender or whether participants were raised on a farm or non-farm. Does involvement as a 4-H club officer, community service activities, 4-H camp impact participant development of life skills? Findings may be to determine if changes need to be made to 4-H project materials or 4-H leader and agent training to enhance project and life skills development for 4-H members.

 

 Research Design

A descriptive research design in the form of a mailed questionnaire was used to determine the impact of participation in 4-H projects such as beef, dog, and veterinary science on the development of life skills. The questionnaire was mailed to 275 participants who were randomly selected from the 1069 4-H youth enrolled in one or more of the beef, dog, or veterinary science projects statewide.  These projects were chosen since beef has the largest project enrollment and the dog and veterinary sciences projects have a resource development relationship with West Virginia University.  Ninety-five respondents (36.3%) returned completed questionnaires.

Non-response error was addressed by comparing early respondents to late respondents (Ary et al., 2006).  A chi-square test of independence was performed to determine if there was a significant relationship between early and late respondents on gender, years in 4-H, residence, ethnicity, years involved in 4-H animal and veterinary science projects, participation as a club officer, involvement in 4-H camping program and community service.  The chi-square values were not significant (α ≤ .05).  It was concluded that non-respondents were similar to respondents; therefore generalizations could be made to the entire population.  However, with a response rate of 36.3% generalizations will be limited to the respondents.

 

 Instrument

The instrument consisted of questions relating to involvement in 4-H projects and activities, project and life skills developed and demographic information.  The questionnaire was presented to a panel of experts to establish content and face validity.  The reliability of the instrument was determined to be exemplary with Spearman-Brown coefficient of .87 (Robinson, Shaver, & Wrightsman, 1991).

Dillman’s (2000) Tailored Design Method was used during each phase of data collection to maximize returns.  This included initial mailing, follow-up postcard and a second complete mailing.

 

Findings

Thirty-three of the respondents (35.9%) were males and 59 respondents (64.1%) were female.  Fifty-four of the respondents (60%) indicated that they lived on a farm, while thirty-six respondents (40%) indicated that they did not live on a farm.  

The number of years respondents had been in 4-H were reported in Table 1.  The highest response rate was from respondents who had been in 4-H four years, followed by those who had been members for nine years.

Table 1

Years Respondents were in 4-H

Years in 4-H

n

%

2 years

7

7.7

3 years

9

9.9

4 years

21

23.1

5 years

8

8.8

6 years

9

9.9

7 years

8

8.8

8 years

8

8.8

9 years

10

11.0

10 years

4

4.4

11 years

2

2.2

12 years

4

4.4

13 years

1

1.1

 

 Involvement in 4-H Activities

Seventy-two respondents (77.4%) indicated that they had been a 4-H club officer.  Of the respondents, 46 (49.5%) reported they had participated in the 4-H camping program, while 78 (83.9%) individuals reported participating in a community service activity.  Forty (43.0%) respondents indicated that they had been involved in a public speaking contest and 40 (43.0%) individuals responded that they had participated in state 4-H contests (see Table 2).

 Table 2

 Respondents Involvement in 4-H Activities

 

No

Yes

 

n

%

n

%

4-H Club officer

21

22.6

72

77.4

Camping program

47

50.5

46

49.5

Community service

15

16.1

78

83.9

Public speaking

53

57.0

40

43.0

State contests

53

57.0

40

43.0

 

Influence of 4-H Animal/Veterinary Science Project Participation on Life Skills Development

Respondents indicated that participation in a 4-H animal/veterinary science projecthad a strong influence on all eight categories of project and life skills development.  A Likert scale was used to interpret the scores: 1.0 -1.5 no influence, 1.6 – 2.5 slight influence, 2.6 -3.5 moderate influence, 3.6-4.5 strong influence, and 4.6-5.0 significant influence.  Participation in a 4-H animal/veterinary science project had a strong influence on decision making, ability to relate to other youth, ability to relate to adults, maintain records, public speaking, give positive self-esteem, help accept leadership roles, and help accept responsibility (see Table 3).

 

Skills/Knowledge Learned From Participation in 4-H Animal/Veterinary Science Projects

Respondents expressed agreement that learning occurred in all 32 categories of project and life skills as a result of participation in their 4-H animal/veterinary science projects.  Over 90 percent of the respondents agreed that they learned to be friends with people who are different from them, follow instructions, accept responsibility for a job, have some control over events in their life, understand what was required for a successful 4-H project, set goals, how to make decisions, the value and importance of ethics, how to select an animal, how to feed an animal, how to practice safety around animals, how to care for an animal, and how to keep an animal healthy (see Table 4). 

Between 85 and 90 percent of the respondents learned to accept different opinions, value contributions of others, gained self-confidence, how to help others, how to groom an animal for show, and how to determine the cost of raising an animal. Between 80 and 85 percent of the respondents learned to help others reach their goals, solve problems that occur in their life, use time and money efficiently, not use illegal drugs or alcohol, feel comfortable saying no to things they don’t want to do, understand animal reproduction, how to show an animal, how to keep records and wanted to tell friends to enroll in a 4-H animal/veterinary science project.  Between 70 and 79 percent of the respondents learned to live a healthy lifestyle and about careers.  While 65 and 69 percent of the respondents learned to meet and work with other cultures and to give oral reasons (see Table 4).

 Table 3

Influence of 4-H Animal/Veterinary Science Project Participation on Life Skills Development2

 

No Influence

Slight

Moderate

Strong

Significant

 

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

M

SD

Decision making

1

1.1

5

5.6

26

28.9

37

41.1

21

23.3

3.80

0.90

Relate to youth

0

0.0

2

2.3

24

27.3

43

48.9

19

21.6

3.90

0.76

Relate to adults

0

0.0

6

6.7

20

22.5

43

48.3

20

22.5

3.87

0.84

Maintain records

2

2.2

6

6.7

20

22.2

39

43.3

23

25.6

3.83

0.96

Public Speaking

2

2.3

6

6.8

26

29.5

29

33.0

25

28.4

3.78

1.01

Positive self esteem

1

1.1

3

3.3

19

21.1

43

47.8

24

26.7

3.96

0.85

Accept leadership roles

0

0.0

2

2.9

11

15.7

32

45.7

25

35.7

4.14

0.79

Accept responsibility

0

0.0

0

0.0

15

16.9

38

42.7

36

40.4

4.24

0.72

2 Likert Scale of 1-5 with 1 representing “No Influence” and 5 representing “Significant Influence”

 

Table 4

Skills/Knowledge Learned From Participation in 4-H Animal/Veterinary Science Projects1 

 

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

 

 

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

M

SD

Accept different opinions

2

2.2

0

0.0

10

11.2

60

67.4

17

19.1

4.01

0.72

Value contributions of others

1

1.1

0

0.0

8

9.0

54

60.7

26

29.2

4.17

0.68

Friends with different people

1

1.1

2

2.2

4

4.4

51

56.7

32

35.6

4.23

0.74

Meet and work with other cultures

2

2.2

4

4.5

21

23.6

39

43.8

23

25.8

3.87

0.93

Help others reach goals

2

2.2

2

2.2

14

15.6

45

50.0

27

30.0

4.03

0.87

Solve my problems

1

1.1

2

2.2

13

14.4

49

54.4

25

27.8

4.06

0.78

Follow instructions

1

1.1

2

2.2

6

6.7

52

57.8

29

32.2

4.18

0.74

Efficient with time and money

1

1.1

2

2.2

11

12.2

49

54.4

27

30.0

4.10

0.78

Accept responsibility

1

1.1

2

2.2

3

3.3

40

44.4

44

48.9

4.38

0.76

Live healthy

1

1.1

2

2.2

17

18.9

48

53.3

22

24.4

3.98

0.79

Don't use drugs or alcohol

2

2.2

3

3.3

13

14.4

25

27.8

47

52.2

4.24

0.98

Control over events in my life

1

1.1

0

0.0

6

6.7

49

55.1

33

37.1

4.27

0.69

Comfortable saying no

1

1.1

1

1.1

13

14.4

39

43.3

36

40.0

4.20

0.81

Tell friends to enroll

1

1.1

2

2.2

12

13.5

39

43.8

35

39.3

4.18

0.83

Understand requirements for successful project

1

1.1

0

0.0

4

4.5

54

60.7

30

33.7

4.26

0.65

Set goals

1

1.1

1

1.1

6

6.7

52

58.4

29

32.6

4.20

0.71

Gain self-confidence

2

2.2

0

0.0

8

8.9

50

55.6

30

33.3

4.18

0.77

Help others

1

1.1

0

0.0

12

13.3

43

47.8

34

37.8

4.21

0.76

Decision making

0

0.0

1

1.1

7

7.8

53

58.9

29

32.2

4.22

0.63

Record keeping

0

0.0

1

1.1

13

14.4

46

51.1

30

33.3

4.17

0.71

Value ethics

0

0.0

1

1.1

6

6.7

49

54.4

34

37.8

4.29

0.64

animal selection

1

1.1

0

0.0

5

5.6

49

54.4

35

38.9

4.30

0.68

Animal feeding

1

1.1

1

1.1

5

5.6

45

50.0

38

42.2

4.31

0.73

Animal grooming

1

1.1

4

4.4

7

7.8

41

45.6

37

41.1

4.21

0.85

Animal reproduction

1

1.1

1

1.1

15

16.7

43

47.8

30

33.3

4.11

0.80

Safety around animals

1

1.1

0

0.0

7

7.8

48

53.3

34

37.8

4.27

0.70

Animal care

1

1.1

0

0.0

4

4.4

47

52.2

38

42.2

4.34

0.67

Animal health

1

1.1

0

0.0

5

5.6

51

56.7

33

36.7

4.28

0.67

Animal showmanship

2

2.2

3

3.3

10

11.1

35

38.9

40

44.4

4.20

0.93

Cost of raising animal

1

1.1

2

2.2

9

10.0

47

52.2

31

34.4

4.17

0.78

Give oral reasons

1

1.1

4

4.5

23

25.8

40

44.9

21

23.6

3.85

0.87

Learn about careers

1

1.1

3

3.3

23

25.6

43

47.8

20

22.2

3.87

0.84

 1 Likert Scale of 1-5 with 1 representing “strongly disagree” and 5 representing “strongly agree”

 

Difference in Agreement by Gender.A t-test statistical procedure was used to determine if differences existed in the level of agreement when compared by gender.  One item was significant (α ≤ .05).  Females expressed greater agreement with the statement that they accept opinions different from their own, than males (see Table 5).

 

 Table 5

Level of Agreement with Skills/Knowledge Learned by Gender

 

Gender

 

 

 

Male

Female

Total

t-value

 

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

 

Accept different opinions

3.76

.83

4.16

.60

4.01

.72

-2.652*

* α ≤ .05

 

Difference in Agreement by Place of Residence.  A t-test statistical procedure was used to determine if differences existed in the amount of agreement with the statements when compared by place of residence. Thirteen items were significant (α ≤ .05).  Members who lived on a farm had higher levels of agreement on all thirteen significant items compared to non-farm members.  Farm members had higher agreement that they learned to: value contributions of others, solve problems that occur in their life, use time and money efficiently, accept responsibility for doing a job, live a healthy lifestyle, learned to practice safety around animals, wanted to tell friends to enroll in a 4-H animal/veterinary science project, understand requirements for a successful project, how to gain self-confidence, how to groom an animal for show, learned how to show an animal, learned how to give oral reasons, and learned about careers (see Table 6).

 

Table 6

Level of Agreement with Skills/Knowledge Learned by Place of Residence

 

Farm

Non-Farm

Total

 

 

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

t-value

Value contributions of others

4.33

.55

4.06

.59

4.22

.58

2.210*

Solve my problems

4.22

.64

3.86

.87

4.07

.76

2.192*

Efficient with time and money

4.27

.60

3.94

.89

4.14

.75

2.060*

Accept responsibility

4.55

.54

4.19

.89

4.40

.72

2.310*

Live healthy

4.22

.64

3.67

.89

3.99

.80

3.153*

Tell friends to enroll

4.35

.69

3.97

.98

4.20

.84

2.117*

Understand requirements for successful project

4.39

.49

4.11

.80

4.28

.64

1.999*

Gain self-confidence

4.33

.59

3.97

.97

4.18

.79

2.156*

Animal grooming

4.38

.69

4.00

1.00

4.23

.84

2.124*

Safety around animals

4.38

.53

4.06

.87

4.25

.70

2.178*

Animal showmanship

4.37

.84

3.94

1.00

4.20

.93

2.130*

Give oral reasons

4.02

.79

3.60

.95

3.85

.87

2.236*

Learn about careers

4.02

.73

3.60

.95

3.85

.84

2.218*

* α ≤ .05

 

Difference in Agreement by Club Officer versus Non Club Officer, Involvement in Community Service and Participation in 4-H Camping Program. A t-test statistical procedure was used to determine if differences existed in the amount of agreement by involvement as a club officer, participation in community service or 4-H camping.  Club officers had higher agreement that participation in a 4-H animal/veterinary science project helped them learn to use time and money efficiently, set goals, help others, select an animal, to groom an animal for show and give oral reasons.  Those members who had participated in a community service project had higher levels of agreement that they had learned how to groom an animal for show and how to show an animal than those who had not been involved in community service.

Members who had not participated in the 4-H camping program had higher levels of agreement compared to those members who had participated in the 4-H camping program.  Higher agreement was found on learned to value contributions of others, be friends with people who are different from them, meet and work with people of other cultures, help others reach their goals, accept responsibility for doing a job, help others, and keep an animal healthy (see Table 7).

 

 Table 7

Level of Agreement with Skills/Knowledge Learned from Participation in 4-H Animal/Veterinary Science Projects by Involvement in Club Officers, Community Service & Camping Programs

 

No

Yes

Total

 

 

 

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

t-value

Club officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Efficient with time and money

3.76

1.00

4.20

.68

4.10

.78

2.325*

Set goals

3.90

1.00

4.29

.57

4.20

.71

2.247*

Help others

3.81

.98

4.33

.63

4.21

.76

2.889*

Animal selection

3.95

1.00

4.40

.52

4.30

.68

2.710*

Animal grooming

3.70

1.22

4.36

.66

4.21

.85

2.317*

Give oral reasons

3.35

.93

4.00

.80

3.85

.87

3.068*

Community service

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Animal grooming

3.79

.97

4.29

.81

4.21

.85

-2.064*

Animal showmanship

3.71

1.33

4.29

.81

4.20

.93

-1.570*

Camping program

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Value contributions of others

4.30

.59

4.02

.74

4.17

.68

1.986*

Friends with different people

4.46

.50

4.00

.86

4.23

.74

3.082*

Meet and work with other cultures

4.07

.72

3.66

1.08

3.87

.93

2.094*

Help others reach goals

4.28

.62

3.77

1.01

4.03

.87

2.874*

Accept responsibility

4.59

.50

4.16

.91

4.38

.76

2.775*

Help others

4.41

.58

4.00

.86

4.21

.76

2.676*

Animal health

4.42

.50

4.13

.79

4.28

.67

2.080*

* α ≤ .05

 

 Conclusions and Discussion

If the goal of youth development programming is to prepare youth for adulthood, through the development of life skills, then this study indicates that 4-H programming in beef, dog and veterinary sciences projects in West Virginia is accomplishing its mission, the projects have a strong influence on life skills development. 

Respondents strongly agree that learning occurred in all 32 categories of project and life skills as a result of participation in their 4-H animal/veterinary science projects.  While club officers tended to have higher levels of agreement on many categories of project and life skills than non-club officers. Females had greater agreement with the statement that they accept opinions different from their own, than their male counterparts.

Significant differences exist between the level of agreement of those who lived on a farm and those who did not, whether or not the members had been involved in community service and whether or not the members had been involved in the 4-H camping program. Members who had not participated in the 4-H camping program had higher levels of agreement.

 

 Implications

The study has widespread implications for 4-H youth agriculture programs as we look at the impact and the variation among members based on place of residence, being a club officer and involvement in the 4-H camping program.  Do members who carry 4-H livestock projects differ significantly than those who have non-livestock related projects? And if so, what makes them different?  How do we address those issues through programming and leader trainings?

 

 References

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006).  Introduction to research in education (7th ed.).  California:  Thomson Wadsworth.

Dillman, D. A. (200).   Mail and internet surveys:  The tailored design method (7th ed.).  New York:  John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

McKee, R.K., Talbert, B.A. & Barkman, S.J. (2002). The challenges associated with change in 4-H/Youth Development. Journal of Extension [On-line]. 40(2).  Retrieved May 15, 2007 from http://www.joe.org/joe/2002april/a5.html

Mincemoyer, C.C. & Corbin, M (2001).  Computer mediated needs assessment to identify 4-H youth curriculum needs.  Journal of Extension, [On-line], 39(5).  Retrieved May 29, 2007, from http://www.joe.org/joe/2001october/rb7.html

Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation.  In J.P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & l. S. Wrightsman (Eds.).  Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16) New York:  Academic Press.

Schlink, K. (2000).  Addressing educational needs of youth in today’s society.  Journal of Extension [On-line], 38(4). Retrieved August 15, 2007 from http://www.joe.org/joe/2000august/comm1.html